Adieu Company reported the following current assets and liabilities for December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Dec. 31, 2014 Dec. 31, 2013Cash $1,000 $1,140Temporary investments 1,200 1,400Accounts receivable 800 910Inventory 2,200 2,300Accounts payable 1,875 2,300a. Compute the quick ratio for December 31, 2014 and 2013.b. Interpret the company’s quick ratio. Is the quick ratio improving or declining?Answer:a.December 31, 2014Quick Ratio = Quick Assets ÷ Current LiabilitiesQuick Ratio = ($1,000 + $1,200 + $800) ÷ $1,875Quick Ratio = 1.6December 31, 2013Quick Ratio = Quick Assets ÷ Current LiabilitiesQuick Ratio = ($1,140 + $1,400 + $910) ÷ $2,300Quick Ratio = 1.5b. The quick ratio of Adieu Company has improved from 1.5 in 2013 to 1.6 in 2014. This increase is the result of a small decrease in the three types of quick assets (cash, temporary investments, and accounts receivable) compared to the larger decrease in the current liability, accounts payable.
Gmeiner Co. had the following current assets and liabilities for two comparative years:
Dec. 31, 2014 Dec. 31, 2013Current assets:Cash $ 486,000 $ 500,000Accounts receivable 210,000 200,000Inventory 375,000 350,000Total current assets $1,071,000 $1,050,000Current liabilities:Current portion of long-term debt $ 145,000 $ 110,000Accounts payable 175,000 150,000Accrued and other current liabilities 260,000 240,000Total current liabilities $ 580,000 $ 500,000a. Determine the quick ratio for December 31, 2014 and 2013.b. Interpret the change in the quick ratio between the two balance sheet dates.Answer:
a. Quick Ratio =December 31, 2013:December 31, 2014:Quick AssetsCurrent Liabilities$500,000 + $200,000$500,000$486,000 + $210,000$580,000= 1.4= 1.2b. The quick ratio decreased between the two balance sheet dates. The major reason is a significant increase in inventory which likely drove the increase in accounts payable. Cash also declined, possibly to purchase the inventory. As a result, quick assets actually declined, while the current liabilities increased. The quick ratio for December 31, 2014, is not yet at an alarming level. However, the trend suggests that the firm’s current asset (working capital) management should be watched closely.